![]() Some editing operations are as much as twice as fast on Apple Silicon than on in Intel-powered Macs, and with the improved energy efficiency of the new system architecture, you’ll be making music for more hours. Not a fan of the beaming with the 64ths in bar 6. 5 provides an affordable way to ease into professional composition, notation, and publishing software. Windows 10 64-bit ApUpdate from Dorico 2. notes with staccato, marcato, etc., is still something I want very much.Dorico manual. Now, I understand the technical problems involved-limitations of MIDI and sound fonts, the need for each instrument to have either a matching patch with no attack, or a way to turn the attack on and off on the fly. Sibelius' playback is quite a bit better. * Playback: My other issue is playback, particularly legato vs. Could someone experienced with both programs tell me whether you have to use the mouse a lot more in MuseScore, a little more, or about the same once you got to know MuseScore? However, such a gross comparison might not tell the whole story. Looking at the help files for both Sibelius 5 and MuseScore, Sib shows 6.5 printed pages of keyboard shortcuts, whereas MuseScore has only two (and in a bigger font). So my philosophy is, use the keyboard for things that I do all the time, use the mouse for things that I do occasionally. I've used a computer for my whole career, and excess mousing has caused me hand problems. ![]() * Keyboard Shortcuts: It's very important for me to use keyboard shortcuts as much as possible, rather than mousing and clicking on palettes. ![]() ![]() ![]() Here are the two big questions I see if I switched to MuseScore: There are a few differences in output, and the MuseScore version needed the margins adjusted and some braces added. I have played a bit with both, using a work-in-progress in Sib 5, which was also exported to MuseScore via MusicXML. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |